Dr.Virágh Ügyvédi Iroda - Dr.Virágh Ügyvédi Iroda

(This is Dr. Attila Virágh) Advantages: - represents the interests of its clients without any special ethical objections (already if this is an advantage) - seeks to take control of the court (and the courtroom) where possible (this can, of course, backfire); In my experience, the basic position of the Lawyer in the courtroom is that everyone who is younger than him knows less than him. - if he knows, he also "toasts" his opposite colleague (he even refers to the judge's tacit consent for half as long) - expresses the client's position in the negotiations and in the documents submitted by him (to the extreme) - if value to you is the ability to "bend" the facts, to pull the time, this can also be an advantage (protection of defendants). Disadvantages: - its preparatory documents do not refer to specifics or laws; rather, they can be called "free-style"; he formulates less logically, his submissions lack clarity, easy transparency - not everyone may like the Lawyer's "loose and confident" style (for example, when he is not wearing his robe at trial) - electronic communication (with the Court) is not its strength - handles dates and deadlines a little loosely - it seems to represent quite a few losing cases - you may not be able to go to your first trial (then you will really understand how much you need the Lawyer). Honest conclusion: That’s why you can also find a better lawyer for the money. Of course, if you are the defendant and no one else accepts you, you can go to the Lawyer.