Hoffer Minőségügyi Szakértői Bt. - Hoffer Minőségügyi Szakértői Bt.

Hoffer contracted with Deichmann and writes blatant lies as a quality checker on bad products to help Deichmann (for example, I used to use cleaning products). It is regrettable that the state allows such obvious Deichmann-Hoffer collusion to the detriment of consumers.

Both shoes in Deichmann broke up and were sent for inspection (a delivery within 6 months). Well I do not know how much they pay for their Deichmann pocket but they have written that it is not a material fault, but a powerful step is the mistake! Ridiculous! My 14-year-old daughter wore shoes for 2 months. Deichmann is more likely to pay for this putrin for a test than replacing a $ 7990 shoe.

20,000 ft. Shattered in 7 months. "Unintended use" Founded for 5,000 ft. This company is a disaster, I'm not sure there is anything between it and Deichmann under the grass. !!

There is no such disgraceful attitude in the world ... It's also a Deichmann case. I never bought shoes, first and last time! The company carried out a check on the product, which was unlawful for my refund when my shoe dropped from my leg within a month. When I got it, I woke up in my hand with the "shoe" that it was normal and I was wrong ... I would be curious about the "working" of the "workers" when a month after that kind of a blanket that was masked as a horseshoe was taken. . (here I would say I did not use it for a tour) So I think it's worth it to the sales company, plus the investigating company, because this is just a business, I've got it! Congratulations! Shame!

found a shoe bought at 2-month-old Deichman that the sole was detached from the upper because I didn’t dry it professionally. and described that the box supplied indicated that it was not waterproof .. you could have looked at it well because it did not come in the box that came with it .. congratulations!

A bunch of misfortunes throughout the company, incompetent people work and form opinions on behalf of professionalism.

It is sad that such obviously fraudulent companies can operate, and they do not take on the assumed warranty terms. The 32s and 35s Galaxy shoes purchased at Deichann were shaved off the kids' feet within three months. "Excessive shoe shifts can be attributed to misuse, ruthless, and special use of footwear that is not proportional to normal wear and tear ...." All this was done by a 6-year-old and 9-year-old child. I hope you will soon write this to a lawyer's child who starts a conciliatory body cake or looks a bit at their nails. I also wrote in a Deichman complaint book to have a trace.

Deichmann shoes. The fault with which the Landrover shoe was sent was not investigated at all. So what did they write a "specialist" opinion about? It turned out that my average foot is not good for shoes. We also found out there were hairs in his box. I didn't even try the box, I didn't even wear it, it wasn't the subject of an investigation. He mentions instrumental testing. For a physical, mechanical fault that I scan in 5 seconds, what kind of instrument do I need? There is a large bone behind the upper part of the big toe. So on top. The material of the shoe as it bends while walking goes into the material strongly (approx. 5-7 mm) and presses the bone quite painfully. As a result, he became limping. Should a shoe cause pain? The deputy store manager also gave me the truth and was amazed at the expert opinion. He was rejected. Since I studied physics, I easily found that the product was defective in construction. I bend the shoe where it bends on my foot, I reach with my finger up to the front and I have already felt the protrusion of the material that was causing the pain. Another, he could not read what the deputy store manager had written when entering the problem, so he dotted out the essential word, the word "bone." If you didn’t know what the shoes were weighing, what did you examine? My phone number was written there. Why didn't you call me ??? There is a world of communication ... Such a case should not be pursued in court, but should be discussed orally, "what is the problem with shoes?"