Office Shoes - Allee - Office Shoes - Allee

I chose a shoe that advertised in capital letters in front of it the board is that 60% discount so 38990 instead of 15990ft is the price. By the time I got to the checkout, the price was already 27,000ft. I spoke about what it is unqualifiable in a voice, arrogantly, cheekily communicated, h is written, h only the price in the shoes is valid! Thank you and congratulations to the business management for keeping such employees and misleading customers in this way! Which is also an infringement from a consumer protection point of view!

The service is very poor, we were inside today my girlfriend and I wanted to change the size because the shoes didn't be good, her partner bought her in the arena but this shop was closer to us. The "nice" young man didn't even wait to finish what we had to say, he looked at the shoes that were on my girlfriend's feet for so long that he tried them on the parquet in the apartment, we also said he can't take it back because he's deducted from his salary and that the shop in the arena is definitely dirtier? ...... a waste of our time and the extra cost of petrol? However, thank you very much to the staff of the shop in the Arena who were very kind and did not understand why this shop (Allee) failed to do so.

In short, the action announced is a lie! explaining: I saw a pair of promotional (looking) shoes. I asked for a different size than the one on the jigsaw. I tried it and then asked for one smaller size that I got from another seller. The size was good, but at the time of payment I noticed that they are not asking for the special price, which I said, I pointed out that this is not the price printed on the shoes. At first, there were a few incomprehensible statements that shoppers were crushing or similar, but that I didn't mean the price tag or the shoe. Was it not clear that you were exposed to the wrong price tag or would there be some damage to the shoe that you unloaded? (Last piece can not be, because it has been tried on two others, was just the way this product is exposed to different colors without price. The exposure is private label items stacked on shelves in the sale price was indicated in a different color is not looking at you.) After the embarrassing scene we went to the shelf and looked at the vendor discount tag on the shelf, he took off and was below the initial price, which is wrong announced by the cash flow, so it was not another shoe árcímkéje the shelf. Then they said after a little thought and outsourced shoe label viewing (you can have two of them, they came to have a sale) that the sale price applies only for a shoe that there is exposed to the rack, only the validity of the article is for SALE ! :HE ??? Why is this not listed? If so, why didn't any of the sellers mention that what's coming from behind isn't a bargain? A school example of customer deception. -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Response from the owner 3 hours ago Dear Gergő Nagy, Based on the information we received from our colleagues, the footwear of your choice reflected the purchase price of the product that was shown to you and accepted it since you purchased the product. Before the product was displayed, the purchase price of another shoe was shown. Thank you for your understanding! Sincerely Office Shoes -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Since there is no way to respond, I can respond to their response by modifying the post. If "The price of another shoe was shown before the product was shipped" is in itself quite embarrassing for the shop. It would be worth paying more attention to such things. A day later (today), back in the store, the same shelf shows the same promotional price tag as yesterday, as can be seen in the attached picture taken today. So much change happened yesterday that the black shoes were on the top shelf and the brown on the bottom. The missing full price tag on the bottom shelf is probably (still) suppressed by a customer, and along this logic, the other waterproof label on the picture probably applies only to the product on the top shelf. There is really no trace of deception.

This is not a consumer friendly business, as long as you pay the money. I recommend this deal to those who don’t think about a shoe lasting more than half a year. Those who think they have to endure more than half a year should not go here because they will be greatly disappointed. They would rather choose another shoe store on the same level and do better. To his answer: Yes it was not my name, but the complaint was in the name of my partner, only He did not want to write, my sense of justice did not let that happen. Mostly their rejection which was outrageous and unfair and that is why I included my opinion.

Complaint handling is catastrophic, lying goes, communication 0, and if you want to talk to someone on the merits, everyone is out of reach and they can't help you. #timberland #Timberland shoes, lining wear in several places after 3 months so that I was wearing 10x ... Bad labmer, bad shoelace use .. of course they have never heard of this before ..