Buda Central District Court of Budapest

They spelled my address outright to always belong to them. Dr. Hornyak János Szabolcs is a pretty racist and unfit judge.

It is not so bad in the minutes of a condominium assembly that something that was not heard at the general meeting is included afterwards. There was only one rebuke from the judge when it turned out. But the Juts remained valid. Other question?

"Marika Tóth - Fill with humor July 5, 6:06 It's done. ? In a lawsuit in a small town, the prosecutor called his first witness, an elderly grandmother. He walked over to him and asked him: "Aunt Kovács, do you know me?" By the time the lady: - Of course I know you. I have known you since you were a child and I can say I was disappointed in you. You lie, you cheat on your wife, you influence people, you slander them behind their backs. You think of yourself as a great man while you don’t have as much mind as a hen. The prosecutor could not spit or swallow in surprise. After some thought, he pointed to the other end of the room and asked: "Aunt Kovács, do you know the defense lawyer?" - Of course. I have also known the defense lawyer since I was a child. He has a weak character, is drink-like in nature, cannot establish a normal relationship with anyone, and as a lawyer, is one of the worst in the country. Not to forget, he also cheats his wife with three women, one of whom is his own wife, Mr. Prosecutor… The defense lawyer was shocked. The judge asked the prosecutor and the lawyer and said very quietly to them: "If any of them ask the lady if she knows me, I swear she'll rot in prison."

Shit place. In 2014, dr. Judge Tamás Édes made a verdict against me, the motivation of which was motivated by a "sympathy" with a doctor who did not take responsibility, lost a malpractice lawsuit and was also seriously condemned by the MOK. Name of the doctor: dr. István Balázs Szemerey - Mediburg Clinic. I wrote the story in the recently published SMALL HUNGARIAN BEAUTY INDUSTRY. my novel. Better than that, Judge! I was stupid not to pamper me! (By the way, I laughed well the day after the verdict anyway. With impunity, to impose an 8-month (suspended) prison at the age of 60 ... well ... thieves don't get that much at first. Anyway, it turned out to be a good story.)

There is never a judgment. Bumps-bumps of judgment. I am suing someone who is being placed in custody, where he is just appealing against being placed in custody. When he is not currently under guardianship, several people are suing an institution for reasons he said. By several I mean 10 on the order of 20. He is already in litigation with the head of the court, various cooperatives, local governments and people. The court is still receiving and discussing your submissions. What if it’s not support for a Permian to survive his perversions? What if it's not a waste of public money? What if it is not disregarding the rights of the defendants?

The operation of the Hungarian judiciary - through the eyes of a law student October 30, 2017 - Forgiveness The ideas below are from a Hungarian law student. Irrepairable prejudice - a term known in Anglo-Saxon law, but also has an equivalent in European legal systems. An irreparable prejudice is when an indictment turns out to have been biased from the outset. However, the evergreen jolly joker in Hungarian courtrooms is that a “different legal culture” prevails in these countries, so whatever happens there is not relevant to us. Referring to this, the courts and other authorities can afford anything. Starting with the sacramentality indicators treated as sacrament, which currently range from 97-98% - there is so much chance of anyone going to court to be convicted - and which, according to a recently published pathological research material from the Mansion, is much, much better than ours. laws like in silly Western European or North American countries where they reach only 65-70%. Apparently, our investigating authorities are also much more adept at detecting crimes than the notoriously left-handed and underpaid FBI or the German, French, or Swiss police. “Any legal system that sees prosecution as an indicator of success rather than the number of convictions is a hotbed of abuse,” begins this sentence with a 2008 U.S. law thesis by Mark Ramseyer, Eric Rasmussen, and Manu Raghav, “Judgments and Indicators of Prosecution: The Prosecutor’s Decision”. who are, by the way, professors at Harvard, Indiana, and Washington and Lee universities. But the other legal order! The laws are much better than ours, please! In Canada, the Supreme Court recently ruled that if a criminal case does not end within 18 months of the suspicion being reported or in higher courts within 30 months, the prosecution must refuse to represent the prosecution. That is when that certain irreparable prejudice comes into play. It cannot be said that the decision would have put Canadian criminal law on top of the head, as the rule has been in place so far, it has just not been specified exactly how long the accused should be left alone. But in Canada, it is inconceivable that the police will investigate a simple crime like a bicycle theft or a street slap for years, or that it will take months or years from the indictment before the court sets the first trial. Delayed justice is the denial of truth, a fundamental that law students are already beaten in the head at the gates of the university in every country where a “different legal culture” prevails. The Hungarian investigation is arbitrary from the first moment to the last. The police or the prosecutor's office will set up a preconception in which the defendant first appointed as a scapegoat can only be guilty and focus solely on obtaining incriminating evidence to prove this. Any evidence against their idea is “irrelevant” or “unacceptable” and the testimony refuting the suspicion or accusation is “false”. Incidentally, the Code of Criminal Procedure provides, both old and new, that the court, the prosecutor's office and the investigating authority are obliged to take into account both rescue and incriminating circumstances of their own motion. In reality, this is just as much a written malt as the “conduct of the proceedings within a reasonable time” guaranteed by the Basic Law. Another legal order is where justice is really about truth. Another legal order is where the court hearing is not a mere formality. Another legal order is where it is not considered a loss of face if one fails to put the “criminal” behind bars at any cost, and another legal order is where the word of defense also has weight. It does not occur to us how it is possible that the average turnaround time for criminal proceedings is 20 months - this only applies to the court period! - but still everyone is condemned. A British, American, Canadian, but even French, German or Austrian lawyer would take his head for this and the judge would be fired immediately. Of course, we don't have one - it's a different legal order here ...

It is not so bad in the minutes of a condominium assembly that something that was not heard at the general meeting is included afterwards. There was only one rebuke from the judge when it turned out. But the Juts remained valid. Other question?

It is a place where they do not seek and do not want to find the truth. The order has nothing to do with reality and truth. More time is spent on formal, non-essential things than on essential, substantive things.